My memories of having a sub are of having fun but not becoming out of control. I was a good kid in school so I didn't even get in trouble, but I have no memory of kids behaving so poorly that you couldn't hear the substitute or they blatantly disregarded what the sub was saying. I don't remember subs throwing students out of the class. I don't remember getting in trouble with my teacher when s/he returned because of the note the sub had left because of behavior. My class never was addressed by administration because of its collective behavior with a sub. All of the above happened this week.
Substitutes have no work to do so when there's a free period, they go to the faculty room to read or, in my case, knit. There I was able to hear from the faculty about how badly the 8th grade had been behaving this week. I also heard the teachers talk of past students and what kind of class they were. this is not new to me; I taught for 12 years. However, I am surprised that despite the teachers' acknowledgment of the poor behavior, the principal defended her students. Furthermore, she suggested that she was familiar with the perceptions surrounding the school and flatly denied that my point had merit. She too speaks to people in the community. I am annoyed because there's a difference in the information and opinions shared between being a principal and being a former student-former parent-current parent-former high school substitute-current educational professional.
Hmmm.....
I live in a town with a dirty secret that no one wants to address. Because our local community opens its high school to two other communities, our students, in high school, meet with students from West Point and Garrison. When I attended the local high school, I suspected that because I was a local, I was not considered to be as strong a student as those kids from Garrison and West Point. This was significantly more obvious when I used to sub at O'Neill before Tyler was born (for those who are counting, that's 10 years ago). The exception was for the star athletes of popular sports. I am convinced that the reason Julia fared so well at O'Neill was because her teachers thought she was a West Pointer.
My friend is an aide at O'Neill now. She backs me up. Another friend has a child at O'Neill; when the child was at the local middle school, she was the top of her class. Now that she's at O'Neill, she has struggled with the more difficult classes. When someone, years ago, suggested that the kids from Highland Falls were not smart, my friend bristled. However, comparatively speaking, there is truth in that message. And, now that my friend's daughter has met these difficulties in high school, she agrees.
So, what does all this have to do with substituting?
Students represent a community in some way. Good teachers have an impact on the behavior and learning of their students in the classroom, but it speaks more about the nature of the students when we see them out and about. when they are not under the eagle eye of their teacher. The community in which I live is an embarrassment. The students are not just rude, but they illustrated very little intelligence and critical thinking.
When O'Neill sees the tumbleweed of poor behavior blow from the middle school and makes a snap judgement about those students, is it any wonder that the kids from Highland Falls are treated as they are?